One comment that I compose in the form of an entry besides here and which in a minute I will post on a social platform beginning with the letter "F":
]]>https://www.hoplophobia.info/gary-klack-summaries-research-from-range-def...]]> - I urge to everyone who knows small about the subject of home "defence" in the United States. Author: Democrat, prof. of criminology, widely develops the subject of defensive usage of weapons. Quote from material: "The reason for silence was that empirical evidence – which, by the way, is highly uncommon in criminology – left no doubt: the defensive usage of firearms is effective in the sense that the hazard of injury, failure of life or possession by an armed victim is little than in another self-defense attempts, including deficiency of opposition (no opposition is not the best defensive tactics at all)". What more can you add? Gary Kleck is far from glorifying weapons as such. Me too. Apart from the fact that I usage my weapon sports due to the fact that it is simply a very developing athletics (focus, concentration, responsibility, movement coordination, etc.), as my fellow doctor said: after skydiving, diving, riding a racer and respective another utmost sports, this is the best utmost athletics after the 50s is sports shooting :-). There's something about it. However, let us return to the subject: I am against all violence, war and any another acts that brutalise society. But delight explain to me how it is for criminals, bandits, mercenaries and the like who are not opposed, precisely the opposite: they usage all force to gain an advantage over others for all purposes, mainly robberies. WHAT will my opposition and my deficiency of defence skills cause? Is it legal that I won't have a weapon to defend that will someway halt the bandits who will have it illegally? due to the fact that they're not getting it legally...
But what interests left-wing homo sapiens. They do not receive rational and logical arguments. They build in their cloud based on lies or half-truths from their media a false image of reality. Why? possibly to get them removed more easy in the future erstwhile they've done their occupation and disarmed whoever they can. Finally, the perfect case for aggressor states to bring in a country that wants to attack itself to the bloom of all signs of utmost pacifist, anti-military movements, etc.
A state devoid of weapons, with a skeletal army, full of societies who want to live only in peace and with olive branches welcome all invaders. perfect for a totalitarian aggressor like Russia. The perfect slaves came. I hope that at least any readers of this text see this threat. And he understands the request to learn to usage defence tools. Not only with knives (these people are most likely the most - surprises me and scares the fascination with white weapons).
Let us think, learn and hope that this discipline will stay in the field of sports fun serving in learning to master and healthy sports competition.
You can visit the platform: ]]>https://www.facebook.com/piotr.szelagowski.5/posts/pfbid0drs8rot8w8uYvzoxmeUPYB7VJSw8dGiWBs2d9Y6VjKH3pRRX6RACA6AZXMV2N1ZXl]]>
