The evaluations of the debates are as ritual and predictable as the debates themselves, But this time it was different.. A large surprise was the expression of the debate, due to the fact that it was based on questions asked to presidential candidates by the candidates themselves, not by journalists. Each of them could ask 3 questions, but 3 different opponents. Additionally, 1 candidate was drawn, which is someway assigned to the question. At first it may have seemed a small strange, but in practice it worked more than well.
First of all, we haven't heard a single question in the kind of what the first bill you're going to sign or what capital you're going to go to on your first abroad visit. The fact that this has happened does not prove the journalists best, but there is no end to the benefits of the debate. Politicians chose their direct rivals most gladly, and thanks to this, candidates with small support practically did not exist. The exception was that it was an exceptionally embarrassing exception, and Mr. Maciak should have a look at the service, starting with an examination of who it is at all, ending with run backing and signing up, due to the fact that how come individual like that easy collected 100,000 signatures is simply a large mystery.
There was besides quite a few confusion caused by Grzegorz Braun, and he decided to push the line of political inadequacy again to origin a scandal. The goal achieved, in the sense that it is said about Braun much and loudly, but the translation into election results can be precisely the opposite, that is, quiet and small. For the 3rd time we saw the happening with the flag, I reached for it Rafał Trzaskowski, but it did not make any difference in the debate and it was much better in this category for Sławomir Mentzen, who made himself a selfie with Simon Holovnia, which, of course, was a mention to the Vatican affair. In total, it was 1 of the more interesting debates that Poles could see in fresh years, and as always each staff saw only 1 winner.
Politicians did not surprise anyone, Mateusz Morawiecki wrote about the double knockout of Trzaskowski, Donald Tusk about Trzaskowski's victory, and it was over everyone, and Simon Holownia usually praised himself. Almost identical were the experts on work who long ago stopped hiding their political preferences. civilian Platform-related politicians and sociologists talked about the decisive triumph of Rafał Trzaskowski, on the another side of the same technological barricades the winner was announced by Karol Nawrocki. Traditionally, these verdicts were announced on appropriate antennas and media pages, according to the above-mentioned key.
However, there was a very spectacular exception, which rapidly moved to the net and became a hit at the same rate.
That kind of thing on TVN
“I regret to say this... I think the best was Karol Nawrocki...” pic.twitter.com/Bc9Lee35JK
— yachts (@yachts) April 28, 2025
Dr. Karolina Wigura, known for her left-liberal sympathies, has repeatedly hosted TVN24 and has been a brick candidate for a politically correct assessment, while she has blinded Monika Olejnik and Sławomir Sierakowski. surely this assessment is most valuable to Karol Nawrockibecause it was voiced by a political opponent and even an enemy, and that is at the same time the best summary of this amazing debate.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
